Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 118: 1-9, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1838845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To define the microbiologic characteristics of animal bites in tropical Australia and the appropriateness of current Australian antimicrobial guidelines for their management. METHODS: This retrospective audit examined hospitalizations in tropical Australia after an animal bite or animal-associated penetrating injury between 2013 and 2020. The primary outcome was a composite of death, intensive care unit admission, amputation, quaternary center transfer, or unplanned rehospitalization. RESULTS: A wide variety of animals were implicated, but snakes (734/1745, 42%), dogs (508/1745, 29%), and cats (153/1745, 9%) were the most common. Hospital presentation after 24 hours (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 68.67 (42.10-112.01)) and a cat-related injury (OR (95% CI): 22.20 (11.18-44.08)) were independently associated with an increased risk of infection. A pathogen not covered by the relevant antimicrobial regimen recommended in Australian guidelines was identified in only 12/1745 (0.7%) cases. The primary outcome occurred in 107/1745 (6%) and was independently associated with tissue trauma (OR (95% CI): 9.29 (6.05-14.25), p<0.001), established deep infection at presentation (OR (95% CI): 2.95 (1.31-6.61), p=0.009) and hospital presentation after 24 hours (OR (95% CI): 1.77 (1.12-2.79), p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A wide variety of animals bite humans in tropical Australia, but empiric antimicrobial regimens recommended in current national guidelines cover almost all the microbiologic isolates from the resulting wounds.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Wound Infection , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Australia/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/epidemiology , Bites and Stings/therapy , Dogs , Hospitalization , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Wound Infection/epidemiology
2.
Pan Afr Med J ; 37: 48, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-926782

ABSTRACT

In the COVID-19's crisis, elective surgery and non-emergent cases were postponed; all other procedures have to be minimized. A 17-year male patient with severe crush and degloving injury over the thigh, gluteal, sacral, and perineum areas was admitted to our Department on the 16th of March 2020. The patient presented soft tissue skin and muscle loss. A double Latissimus Dorsi and Anterolateral Thigh free flaps were indicated. However, due to the particular circumstance of the COVID-19 crisis, we applied domestic negative wound therapy (NPWT) using gauzes and wall suction. We obtained suitable granulation tissue after 17 consecutive days with this treatment. The raw area was then covered with an expanded split-thickness skin graft. The wound healed at 95%, and the patient was discharged on 25th of April 2020. He was followed up in an outpatient setting with wound care and physiotherapy. This case showed that in a limited-resource setting, with available wall suction, the domestic NPWT is a versatile tool to promote granulation tissue.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Crush Injuries/surgery , Degloving Injuries/surgery , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Surgical Flaps/transplantation , Accidents, Traffic , Adolescent , Bandages , Buttocks/injuries , COVID-19 , Debridement , Humans , Male , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Pandemics , Perineum/injuries , SARS-CoV-2 , Thigh/injuries , Wound Healing , Wound Infection/drug therapy , Wound Infection/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL